Total Commodity Programs in Red Lake County, Minnesota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 250
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Red Lake County, Minnesota totaled $5,085,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Darrell A Payment | Red Lake Falls, MN 56750 | $41,022 |
42 | Chs Capital LLC ** | Inver Grove Heights, MN 55077 | $40,601 |
43 | Paul M Hanson | Crookston, MN 56716 | $39,845 |
44 | J & J Bachand Farms Inc | Erskine, MN 56535 | $39,467 |
45 | Bachton Enterprises Inc | Brooks, MN 56715 | $39,463 |
46 | Nickolas Knute Knutson | Red Lake Falls, MN 56750 | $38,972 |
47 | Trinity Creek Ranch Inc | Red Lake Falls, MN 56750 | $37,037 |
48 | Gdw Inc | Oklee, MN 56742 | $36,319 |
49 | Knute N Knutson | Red Lake Falls, MN 56750 | $35,391 |
50 | Steven L Linder | Oklee, MN 56742 | $34,767 |
51 | Nicholas Walter Seeger | Plummer, MN 56748 | $34,576 |
52 | Matthew Joseph Knutson | Red Lake Falls, MN 56750 | $34,510 |
53 | Pederson Brothers Partnership | Bejou, MN 56516 | $32,860 |
54 | Steve E Seeger | Red Lake Falls, MN 56750 | $32,704 |
55 | Nicholas J Knott | Red Lake Falls, MN 56750 | $32,639 |
56 | Emily Rae Knutson | Red Lake Falls, MN 56750 | $32,432 |
57 | Craig Linus Schmitz | Red Lake Falls, MN 56750 | $31,529 |
58 | Ultima Bank ** | Bemidji, MN 56601 | $30,798 |
59 | Beyer Brothers | Red Lake Falls, MN 56750 | $30,720 |
60 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $30,107 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”