Wildfires and Hurricane Indemnity Program Payments in Stevens County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 160
Recipients of Wildfires and Hurricane Indemnity Program Payments from farms in Stevens County, Minnesota totaled $5,152,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Wildfires and Hurricane Indemnity Program Payments 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Henrichs Farms LLC | Donnelly, MN 56235 | $68,894 |
22 | Mark Van Horn | Donnelly, MN 56235 | $67,901 |
23 | Jon Hallman | Chokio, MN 56221 | $65,752 |
24 | Guy E Koehl | Hancock, MN 56244 | $63,647 |
25 | Asmus Grain LLC | Chokio, MN 56221 | $62,902 |
26 | Decamp Brothers Inc | Chokio, MN 56221 | $58,823 |
27 | Kevin Dean Loge | Donnelly, MN 56235 | $58,392 |
28 | Donald Sperr | Morris, MN 56267 | $58,295 |
29 | Tamela Sperr | Morris, MN 56267 | $58,295 |
30 | Blackwelder Farms Inc | Chokio, MN 56221 | $57,811 |
31 | Daco Farms Inc | Hancock, MN 56244 | $57,568 |
32 | Dierks Bros Inc | Chokio, MN 56221 | $52,498 |
33 | Denmar Farms Inc | Herman, MN 56248 | $52,384 |
34 | Middle D Farms Inc | Chokio, MN 56221 | $52,384 |
35 | Dlw Unlimited Inc | Herman, MN 56248 | $52,384 |
36 | Dean Erickson | Chokio, MN 56221 | $51,206 |
37 | Lawrence J Hartman | Chokio, MN 56221 | $49,491 |
38 | Schaefer Bros Inc | Hancock, MN 56244 | $48,861 |
39 | Nuest Partnership | Hancock, MN 56244 | $48,766 |
40 | Reid A Haberer | Lowry, MN 56349 | $45,986 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”