Counter Cyclical Program in Wilkin County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 576
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Wilkin County, Minnesota totaled $2,927,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Robert Hovland | Rothsay, MN 56579 | $27,139 |
22 | Blaufuss Farms Inc | Breckenridge, MN 56520 | $27,067 |
23 | Cheryl L Nichol | Wolverton, MN 56594 | $26,425 |
24 | Hought Farm Partnership | Foxhome, MN 56543 | $25,880 |
25 | Todd Klein | Breckenridge, MN 56520 | $25,868 |
26 | Patricia J Farrar | Britton, SD 57430 | $25,198 |
27 | Ernst & Son | Wolverton, MN 56594 | $24,322 |
28 | Richard Scheffler | Barnesville, MN 56514 | $23,632 |
29 | Steiner & Sons Inc | Foxhome, MN 56543 | $23,371 |
30 | Yaggie Farms Jeffrey & Janet | Breckenridge, MN 56520 | $23,258 |
31 | Peter Aasness | Fergus Falls, MN 56537 | $23,221 |
32 | Dennis Van Wechel | Wolverton, MN 56594 | $22,566 |
33 | Kevin Solum | Barnesville, MN 56514 | $21,800 |
34 | Daniel Solum | Rothsay, MN 56579 | $21,800 |
35 | Roger L Ouse | Grove City, OH 43123 | $21,500 |
36 | Brian Durensky | Barnesville, MN 56514 | $20,811 |
37 | Michael O Haarstad | Rothsay, MN 56579 | $20,806 |
38 | Kressin Farms Incorporated | Breckenridge, MN 56520 | $20,758 |
39 | Hgb Incorporated | Breckenridge, MN 56520 | $20,742 |
40 | E.d. Askegaard Farms Inc | Comstock, MN 56525 | $20,140 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”