Emergency Conservation Program in Mississippi, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 9,110
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in Mississippi totaled $54,650,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Tamara E Crosby Revocable Trust | Bend, OR 97701 | $241,259 |
2 | Christine E Crosby Revocable Trus | Bend, OR 97708 | $241,259 |
3 | Seward Farms | Lucedale, MS 39452 | $241,221 |
4 | Freddie Dial | Scooba, MS 39358 | $218,976 |
5 | Oak-den Farm LLC | New Orleans, LA 70118 | $200,000 |
6 | Jerry W Russell | Sumrall, MS 39482 | $189,511 |
7 | James Mitchell Lowrey | Macon, MS 39341 | $178,560 |
8 | Osmond Crosby | Wiggins, MS 39577 | $172,248 |
9 | B & C Land & Timber | Wiggins, MS 39577 | $152,250 |
10 | Donald E Ratcliff | Jayess, MS 39641 | $136,037 |
11 | Russel Kyle/ Dba Kyle Fish Farm | Columbus, MS 39705 | $131,535 |
12 | Pilkinton Brothers Catfish Farm | Columbus, MS 39705 | $125,865 |
13 | Pierce Farms | Lucedale, MS 39452 | $117,699 |
14 | Harley E Havard & Marion S Tanner | Lucedale, MS 39452 | $112,343 |
15 | C Steve Farrar | Waynesboro, MS 39367 | $110,290 |
16 | Eaton Farms | Rienzi, MS 38865 | $110,260 |
17 | West Berry Farm LLC | Columbus, MS 39702 | $108,550 |
18 | D & M Catfish Inc | Macon, MS 39341 | $106,990 |
19 | Wendell Lee | Purvis, MS 39475 | $104,605 |
20 | James Ryan Maxey | Laurel, MS 39443 | $102,250 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>