Farm Subsidy information
Mississippi
Total Subsidies in Mississippi, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 23,186
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Mississippi totaled $376,241,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | 3-rock Farms Partnership | Cleveland, MS 38732 | $411,245 |
42 | Fioranelli Brothers Joint Venture | Cleveland, MS 38732 | $411,109 |
43 | Canton Mart Farms Partnership | Cleveland, MS 38732 | $408,598 |
44 | Little Thailand Farms II | Nesbit, MS 38651 | $408,524 |
45 | Alexander Farms LLC | Vardaman, MS 38878 | $407,286 |
46 | Bruton Farms Partnership | Hollandale, MS 38748 | $391,893 |
47 | Pemble Farms Partnership II | Merigold, MS 38759 | $385,855 |
48 | Carter Plantation Limited | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $382,695 |
49 | Mississippi Land Bank Aca ** | Saltillo, MS 38866 | $378,330 |
50 | Lakeland Planting Company | Hollandale, MS 38748 | $374,280 |
51 | Twin Ridge Farms Partnership II | Cleveland, MS 38732 | $370,110 |
52 | Aesland Farms | Prairie, MS 39756 | $369,627 |
53 | The Cleveland State Bank ** | Cleveland, MS 38732 | $359,720 |
54 | B L Lamensdorf Farms | Cary, MS 39054 | $349,397 |
55 | Gypsy Farms | Greenville, MS 38703 | $338,958 |
56 | Lewis M Bailey Iv Farms Partnership | Bruce, MS 38915 | $337,956 |
57 | Holmes County Bank & Trust Compan ** | Lexington, MS 39095 | $333,967 |
58 | Allendale Planting Co | Shelby, MS 38774 | $331,583 |
59 | Greenland Planting Co | Leland, MS 38756 | $326,734 |
60 | Robertson Planting | Indianola, MS 38751 | $323,396 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”