Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Mississippi, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 14,009

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Mississippi totaled $212,715,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2
1995-2023
1Agrifund LLC **Amarillo, TX 79106$2,276,031
2Seward & Son Planting CompanyLouise, MS 39097$914,687
3Phillips Brothers Farms LLCYazoo City, MS 39194$750,000
4New Hope FarmsSchlater, MS 38952$602,662
5Sykes Southern AcresCrawford, MS 39743$567,638
6Staple Cotton Discount CorpGreenwood, MS 38935$534,236
7Holly Ridge Planting CoIndianola, MS 38751$533,486
8Silent Shade Planting CompanyBelzoni, MS 39038$532,522
9St Rest Planting CoIndianola, MS 38751$520,312
10C & E Farms PartnershipCoffeeville, MS 38922$510,156
11Bear Creek Fisheries IncMoorhead, MS 38761$500,000
12Tackett Fish FarmsSchlater, MS 38952$500,000
13Ted Parker Cattle LLCSeminary, MS 39479$500,000
14Greenforest Nursery IncPerkinston, MS 39573$500,000
15Citizens Bank & Trust Co **Marks, MS 38646$492,485
16Battle Fish NorthTunica, MS 38676$485,955
17Topashaw Farms PartnershipVardaman, MS 38878$473,869
18Courtney Farms LLCLucedale, MS 39452$472,618
19Seward FarmsLucedale, MS 39452$468,493
20Adron FarmsMinter City, MS 38944$453,708

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag