Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in Mississippi, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 9,327

Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in Mississippi totaled $647,263,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC)
1995-2023
1First South Farm Credit Aca **Winnsboro, LA 71295$22,275,559
2Planters Bank & Trust Company **Indianola, MS 38751$21,159,199
3First National Bank Of Clarksdale **Clarksdale, MS 38614$14,194,051
4Guaranty Bank & Trust Co **Belzoni, MS 39038$12,102,503
5Agrifund LLC **Amarillo, TX 79106$10,646,907
6The Jefferson Bank **Greenville, MS 38704$10,114,786
7Regions Bank **Grenada, MS 38901$8,885,312
8Bank Of Commerce **Greenwood, MS 38935$8,487,654
9Bank Of Anguilla **Anguilla, MS 38721$8,408,040
10Bankplus **Yazoo City, MS 39194$6,605,471
11First Security Bank **Batesville, MS 38606$6,422,668
12State Bank & Trust Company **Greenwood, MS 38935$6,269,377
13Citizens Bank & Trust Co **Marks, MS 38646$6,009,382
14Southern Agricultural Credit Corp **Rolling Fork, MS 39159$5,387,856
15Southern Bancorp Bank **Trumann, AR 72472$3,888,179
16Steele FarmsHollandale, MS 38748$3,849,734
17Seward & Son Planting CompanyLouise, MS 39097$3,714,707
18Staple Cotton Discount CorpGreenwood, MS 38935$3,196,662
19Circle H Joint VentureCleveland, MS 38732$3,147,957
20Satterfield FarmsBenoit, MS 38725$3,048,014

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag