Farm Subsidy information

Adams County, Mississippi

Total Subsidies in Adams County, Mississippi, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 848

Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Adams County, Mississippi totaled $49,216,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Subsidies
1995-2023
21Francis James Daniel GasquetNatchez, MS 39120$311,478
22Robert L Johnson JrNatchez, MS 39121$306,442
23Armstrong Family Farm PartnershipNatchez, MS 39120$284,441
24M & M Farm PartnershipBastrop, LA 71220$276,348
25Davidson Farms IncNatchez, MS 39120$263,535
26Carthage Point Planting Company LLCNatchez, MS 39120$259,671
27James M Sessions IIIWoodville, MS 39669$256,439
28Broadview Ranches IncCentreville, MS 39631$253,367
29Kenneth L Isbell SrNatchez, MS 39121$251,819
30Louis E Guedon II Children IrrevoChurch Hill, MS 39120$250,586
31Pinecrest PlantationNatchez, MS 39121$247,410
32James Cattle & Land CoFort Worth, TX 76147$240,390
33Charles DavidsonNatchez, MS 39120$239,425
34Chadwick J VinesWoodville, MS 39669$232,373
35Bnj FarmsPoplarville, MS 39470$225,312
36R Michael GuedonNatchez, MS 39120$225,263
37Henry W Darden JrCentreville, MS 39631$222,182
38Darden Family Partners LpCentreville, MS 39631$221,595
39Latta RatcliffeNatchez, MS 39120$218,227
40Rivercrest Limited PartnershipNatchez, MS 39120$214,824

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag