Farm Subsidy information
Adams County, Mississippi
Total Subsidies in Adams County, Mississippi, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 173
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Adams County, Mississippi totaled $1,345,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Francis James Daniel Gasquet | Natchez, MS 39120 | $10,441 |
22 | Black Jack Land Lp | Sibley, MS 39165 | $9,428 |
23 | Ann Arbor Properties LLC | Frederick, MD 21703 | $8,788 |
24 | Robert L Johnson Jr | Natchez, MS 39121 | $8,550 |
25 | Grover Yelverton | Natchez, MS 39120 | $8,543 |
26 | Turnbull Ranch Inc | Woodville, MS 39669 | $8,377 |
27 | Burkley Farms Inc | Natchez, MS 39121 | $8,312 |
28 | Pinecrest Plantation | Natchez, MS 39121 | $7,986 |
29 | Latta Ratcliffe | Natchez, MS 39120 | $7,912 |
30 | Betty R Justice Trust | Madison, MS 39110 | $7,868 |
31 | Ross Dunbar Mcgehee | Natchez, MS 39120 | $7,859 |
32 | Stephen D Weeks | Vidalia, LA 71373 | $7,016 |
33 | Louis Guedon Farms LLC | Natchez, MS 39120 | $6,838 |
34 | Diane D Tanksley | Lorman, MS 39096 | $6,753 |
35 | Carl Ricky Guillory | Baton Rouge, LA 70802 | $6,716 |
36 | Guedon Vegetables LLC | Natchez, MS 39120 | $6,635 |
37 | Melaco LLC | Cut Off, LA 70345 | $6,598 |
38 | Mike Guedon Farms LLC | Natchez, MS 39120 | $6,456 |
39 | Jackie M Sojourner | Natchez, MS 39120 | $6,441 |
40 | Eg Farms LLC | Natchez, MS 39120 | $6,267 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”