Total Commodity Programs in Bolivar County, Mississippi, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 192
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Bolivar County, Mississippi totaled $1,437,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Prewitt Farms | Boyle, MS 38730 | $112,957 |
2 | Three M Farms | Sunflower, MS 38778 | $59,375 |
3 | Brushy Lake Farms Of Bolivar Co | Clarksdale, MS 38614 | $52,896 |
4 | Pemble Farms Partnership II | Merigold, MS 38759 | $52,011 |
5 | Terrapin Planting Company | Cleveland, MS 38732 | $48,145 |
6 | Twin Ridge Farms Partnership II | Cleveland, MS 38732 | $47,500 |
7 | Morgan Planting Co Partnership | Shaw, MS 38773 | $45,523 |
8 | Dean Partnership | Boyle, MS 38730 | $44,196 |
9 | Bass Farms | Clarksdale, MS 38614 | $35,625 |
10 | Robertson Farms II Partnership | Rosedale, MS 38769 | $32,092 |
11 | Callow & Callow | Shelby, MS 38774 | $28,127 |
12 | Crossroads Farm Partnership | Drew, MS 38737 | $24,325 |
13 | Gant & Sons Partnership | Merigold, MS 38759 | $23,791 |
14 | Bell & Bell Partnership | Duncan, MS 38740 | $23,750 |
15 | Red Fox Farms Partnership | Benoit, MS 38725 | $22,791 |
16 | Mosco Farms Partnership | Cleveland, MS 38732 | $22,323 |
17 | Dry Rain Farms LLC | Shelby, MS 38774 | $20,836 |
18 | Griffin Planting Company | Cleveland, MS 38732 | $20,504 |
19 | Bell Farms Partnership | Duncan, MS 38740 | $20,022 |
20 | Connell Farms | Cleveland, MS 38732 | $19,480 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>