Market Loss Assistance Program in Claiborne County, Mississippi, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 98
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Claiborne County, Mississippi totaled $1,207,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Valley Of The Moon Farms | Hermanville, MS 39086 | $199,906 |
2 | Rock Lake Planting Co | Port Gibson, MS 39150 | $163,124 |
3 | David Allen Doyle | Port Gibson, MS 39150 | $129,487 |
4 | James O Carpenter Sr | Port Gibson, MS 39150 | $120,008 |
5 | Coles Creek Planting Co | Natchez, MS 39120 | $96,980 |
6 | William V Greer | Hermanville, MS 39086 | $55,552 |
7 | James R Greer | Hermanville, MS 39086 | $55,552 |
8 | Doyle Planting Co Inc | Port Gibson, MS 39150 | $53,168 |
9 | Bill Womack Farms | Utica, MS 39175 | $32,772 |
10 | E A Porter Farms Inc | Pattison, MS 39144 | $30,303 |
11 | Barland Farms L P | Hermanville, MS 39086 | $18,225 |
12 | Burton O Byrnes II | Hermanville, MS 39086 | $15,870 |
13 | Rhada L Hopkins | Vicksburg, MS 39180 | $15,649 |
14 | Barland Brothers | Hermanville, MS 39086 | $14,972 |
15 | Galbreath Family Lmtd Partnshp | Natchez, MS 39120 | $12,263 |
16 | C D Porter Farms Inc | Pattison, MS 39144 | $10,727 |
17 | Rushbrook Farms Inc | Oxford, MS 38655 | $10,355 |
18 | Sam G Riddell | Jackson, MS 39211 | $9,522 |
19 | James Larry Payne | Hattiesburg, MS 39402 | $8,796 |
20 | Karla D Back | Little Rock, AR 72212 | $8,666 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>