Production Flexibility Program in Coahoma County, Mississippi, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 504
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Coahoma County, Mississippi totaled $63,795,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Smith Planting Company | Clarksdale, MS 38614 | $698,235 |
22 | Ellendale Farms | Clarksdale, MS 38614 | $681,919 |
23 | Romar Farms | Jonestown, MS 38639 | $671,854 |
24 | Rutland Farms | Lula, MS 38644 | $617,955 |
25 | Dulaney Brothers Farms | Clarksdale, MS 38614 | $617,608 |
26 | Flea Harbor Farms | Lula, MS 38644 | $611,703 |
27 | Friars Point Farms | Memphis, TN 38117 | $607,315 |
28 | Funderburk Farms | Clarksdale, MS 38614 | $601,188 |
29 | St Charles Plantation | Rena Lara, MS 38767 | $599,596 |
30 | Forrest Plantation | Rena Lara, MS 38767 | $599,014 |
31 | David Caudell Farms Partnership | Tutwiler, MS 38963 | $552,793 |
32 | Johnson Planting Company | Lula, MS 38644 | $552,344 |
33 | Gist Farms | Friars Point, MS 38631 | $539,793 |
34 | Sigmon Farms | Sherard, MS 38669 | $527,090 |
35 | Milbrand Farms | Germantown, TN 38138 | $525,431 |
36 | Increase Plantations | Lyon, MS 38645 | $522,140 |
37 | Tedford Planting Company | Lyon, MS 38645 | $501,368 |
38 | Moon Lake Farms | Clarksdale, MS 38614 | $483,830 |
39 | Charles Antici Farms | Clarksdale, MS 38614 | $473,479 |
40 | Homewood Planting Company | Lyon, MS 38645 | $461,813 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”