Total Conservation Programs in Coahoma County, Mississippi, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 462
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Coahoma County, Mississippi totaled $28,524,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Kenneth O Williams Trust | Clarksdale, MS 38614 | $364,448 |
22 | Bowen Flowers | Clarksdale, MS 38614 | $330,213 |
23 | P F Williams III | Clarksdale, MS 38614 | $305,465 |
24 | Ray Dawson Farms Ptr | Brickeys, AR 72320 | $302,997 |
25 | River View Land Company | Lyon, MS 38645 | $302,124 |
26 | Michael T Lewis | Oxford, MS 38655 | $291,369 |
27 | Pauline Shuler Lewis | Oxford, MS 38655 | $291,366 |
28 | Spradling Brothers Farms, Inc. | Marks, MS 38646 | $280,595 |
29 | Abbie Williams | Memphis, TN 38117 | $276,219 |
30 | Walter Dunn | Mountain Brk, AL 35213 | $276,219 |
31 | Bobo Brake LLC | Canton, MS 39046 | $272,058 |
32 | Byrd Sons Residual Trust | Clarksdale, MS 38614 | $246,411 |
33 | Kincade Girls LLC | Greenville, MS 38701 | $243,864 |
34 | William E Merritt | Lyon, MS 38645 | $229,764 |
35 | Thomas W Allen | Lyon, MS 38645 | $208,096 |
36 | M B Mckee | Friars Point, MS 38631 | $200,159 |
37 | Campbell Brothers Farm No 2 | Lyon, MS 38645 | $181,143 |
38 | Dan F Crumpton Jr | Clarksdale, MS 38614 | $176,458 |
39 | David Mattson Flowers | Lyon, MS 38645 | $172,260 |
40 | Moon Lake Farms | Clarksdale, MS 38614 | $171,097 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”