Conservation Reserve Program in Coahoma County, Mississippi, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 131
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Coahoma County, Mississippi totaled $1,335,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Lake Charles Trees Partnership | Clarksdale, MS 38614 | $157,615 |
2 | Allendale Planting Co | Shelby, MS 38774 | $101,743 |
3 | Johnson Planting Company | Lula, MS 38644 | $80,091 |
4 | Pogo Land Co LLC | Madison, MS 39130 | $50,000 |
5 | Duncan F Williams | Memphis, TN 38138 | $47,780 |
6 | Graeber Gibbes And Pitts Enterprises | Marks, MS 38646 | $44,291 |
7 | James Jennings | Clarksdale, MS 38614 | $36,067 |
8 | Graeber Caledonia Trust | Marks, MS 38646 | $31,978 |
9 | Rodney P Garrison | Dundee, MS 38626 | $31,583 |
10 | George Hirsberg | Clarksdale, MS 38614 | $31,583 |
11 | Emily Williams Dunn | Mountain Brk, AL 35213 | $30,691 |
12 | Abbie Williams | Memphis, TN 38117 | $30,691 |
13 | Walter Dunn | Mountain Brk, AL 35213 | $30,691 |
14 | Kenneth O Williams Trust | Clarksdale, MS 38614 | $29,894 |
15 | Byrd Sons Residual Trust | Clarksdale, MS 38614 | $24,539 |
16 | Virgil Rudolph Massey Jr | Russellville, AR 72802 | $23,438 |
17 | River View Land Company | Lyon, MS 38645 | $22,971 |
18 | Bowen Flowers | Clarksdale, MS 38614 | $22,319 |
19 | Butler Planting Company LLC | Clarksdale, MS 38614 | $22,170 |
20 | Eula H Luckett Marital Trust | Tutwiler, MS 38963 | $21,518 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>