Farm Subsidy information
Franklin County, Mississippi
Total Subsidies in Franklin County, Mississippi, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 72
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Franklin County, Mississippi totaled $721,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Arliss Ike Williamson Jr | Meadville, MS 39653 | $3,911 |
22 | Jamie Seale Jap Farms | Meadville, MS 39653 | $3,539 |
23 | Scarbrough Dorsey Farms LLC | Orange Beach, AL 36561 | $2,773 |
24 | Cindy L Wollerson | Winnsboro, LA 71295 | $2,713 |
25 | Jimmy Ben Walker | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $2,371 |
26 | Homochitto River Park Inc | Meadville, MS 39653 | $2,366 |
27 | Anna Martin Nettles | Clinton, MS 39056 | $1,794 |
28 | Joseph Ray Emfinger Jr | Meadville, MS 39653 | $1,674 |
29 | Russell Joseph Poirrier | Terry, MS 39170 | $1,472 |
30 | Shelly Norris Cowart | Smithdale, MS 39664 | $1,467 |
31 | William Lydell Rand | Meadville, MS 39653 | $1,279 |
32 | Gary W Bennett | Meadville, MS 39653 | $1,166 |
33 | Karen Walley Clements | Bude, MS 39630 | $1,160 |
34 | Beverly King Hill | Bude, MS 39630 | $1,079 |
35 | Billy Gene Martin Jr | Roxie, MS 39661 | $1,051 |
36 | Jack S Smith Jr | Bogue Chitto, MS 39629 | $997 |
37 | Tim M Hill II | Bude, MS 39630 | $960 |
38 | Ottice Carey Mckenzie | Smithdale, MS 39664 | $852 |
39 | Nancy Sholar Stafford | Smithdale, MS 39664 | $822 |
40 | Ray Oliver Futch | Smithdale, MS 39664 | $799 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”