Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Issaquena County, Mississippi, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 63
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Issaquena County, Mississippi totaled $10,078,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | T K Farms | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $134,490 |
22 | Sherrill Farms | Mayersville, MS 39113 | $125,176 |
23 | Magnolia Plantation Partners | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $115,674 |
24 | Jr Heigle Farms | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $114,296 |
25 | G M Farms | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $105,360 |
26 | Kerr & Kerr Farms LLC | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $98,573 |
27 | L & R Farms | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $93,660 |
28 | Todd Heigle Farms Inc | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $90,234 |
29 | Tyler Hankins | Delta City, MS 39061 | $77,656 |
30 | First Service Bank ** | Dermott, AR 71638 | $64,082 |
31 | Walker Cottonwood Farms LLC | Lake Providence, LA 71254 | $60,996 |
32 | Tommy A Williams | Grace, MS 38745 | $54,253 |
33 | Delta Wildlife & Forestry Inc | Greenwood, MS 38935 | $41,124 |
34 | Lee Ross | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $40,902 |
35 | Delaney Fish Ponds Inc | Grace, MS 38745 | $40,350 |
36 | Richard Jones | Mayersville, MS 39113 | $39,736 |
37 | Mcarthur Lewis | Grace, MS 38745 | $32,448 |
38 | Top Dog Farms | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $31,863 |
39 | Cool Cat | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $26,651 |
40 | Valley Park Plantation LLC | Vicksburg, MS 39181 | $23,214 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”