Market Gains in Issaquena County, Mississippi, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 43
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Issaquena County, Mississippi totaled $3,246,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Middleton Planting Company | Glen Allan, MS 38744 | $19,292 |
22 | Carmen H Mabus Estate | Cambridge, MA 02138 | $19,200 |
23 | Sammy Price | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $19,087 |
24 | Island Farms Inc | Kennett, MO 63857 | $14,132 |
25 | H & H Farms Partnership | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $13,167 |
26 | Cottonwood Recreational Land Inc | Mayersville, MS 39113 | $12,717 |
27 | Albert Mahalitc Farms | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $12,631 |
28 | Hamlin And Hamlin N P | Grace, MS 38745 | $11,971 |
29 | Prentiss L Ross Jr | Glen Allan, MS 38744 | $10,355 |
30 | W C Woodruff | Glen Allan, MS 38744 | $5,825 |
31 | Mary D Woodruff | Glen Allan, MS 38744 | $5,825 |
32 | Ricky Harden | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $5,728 |
33 | Lee Ross | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $4,700 |
34 | Kenneth Hendrix Farm | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $2,934 |
35 | Art Arrington Farms | Glen Allan, MS 38744 | $1,991 |
36 | Goza Farms | Grace, MS 38745 | $1,683 |
37 | James T Mabus Estate | Mayersville, MS 39113 | $1,259 |
38 | Goldrush Farms Inc | Hollandale, MS 38748 | $1,073 |
39 | G S Holdings Inc | Mayersville, MS 39113 | $962 |
40 | David N Mann | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $866 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”