Farm Subsidy information
Issaquena County, Mississippi
Total Subsidies in Issaquena County, Mississippi, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 140
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Issaquena County, Mississippi totaled $6,733,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | M C Ewing III | Anguilla, MS 38721 | $21,862 |
42 | L & R Farms | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $21,574 |
43 | Blt Corporation | Madison, MS 39110 | $21,145 |
44 | Edwards Farms Corp | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $21,130 |
45 | Goldrush Farms Inc | Hollandale, MS 38748 | $21,091 |
46 | Fins & Feathers LLC | Ocean Springs, MS 39564 | $20,270 |
47 | Walker Cottonwood Farms LLC | Lake Providence, LA 71254 | $20,132 |
48 | Triple R Farms | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $19,589 |
49 | Stan Delaney | Grace, MS 38745 | $19,315 |
50 | Leed's LLC | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $18,838 |
51 | Richard Jones | Mayersville, MS 39113 | $18,648 |
52 | John Crawford | Cary, MS 39054 | $18,248 |
53 | Cannonwall Plantation Inc | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $18,214 |
54 | B & B Farms | Valley Park, MS 39177 | $17,808 |
55 | Sarah Cutoff LLC | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $17,425 |
56 | Delaney Fish Ponds Inc | Grace, MS 38745 | $17,083 |
57 | Southern Bancorp Bank ** | Trumann, AR 72472 | $13,946 |
58 | Tiffany D Kruger | Brandon, MS 39047 | $13,864 |
59 | Myresville A Mississippi Partnership | Greenville, MS 38701 | $13,821 |
60 | Paradise Farms Partnership | Vicksburg, MS 39180 | $13,100 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”