Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Issaquena County, Mississippi, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 49

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Issaquena County, Mississippi totaled $3,123,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2
1995-2023
1Nipper Farms PartnershipRolling Fork, MS 39159$250,099
2G M FarmsRolling Fork, MS 39159$238,499
3Needmore Fisheries LLCGlen Allan, MS 38744$201,312
4Esperanza Planting CoGlen Allan, MS 38744$198,145
5Magnolia Plantation PartnersRolling Fork, MS 39159$164,068
6T K FarmsRolling Fork, MS 39159$151,608
7B & R FarmsRolling Fork, MS 39159$140,774
8Straight Lake FarmsDelta City, MS 39061$137,992
9Sherrill FarmsMayersville, MS 39113$136,675
10E B FarmsGrace, MS 38745$131,755
11Willette Farms PartnershipRolling Fork, MS 39159$131,007
12Hamlin And Hamlin N PGrace, MS 38745$114,069
13O J Sharpe FarmsRolling Fork, MS 39159$104,195
14Forest Glade PlantationGrace, MS 38745$99,379
15Kelso FarmsValley Park, MS 39177$80,170
16Albert MahalitcRolling Fork, MS 39159$78,601
17Waye Windham FarmsRolling Fork, MS 39159$74,141
18Todd Heigle Farms IncRolling Fork, MS 39159$64,894
19Flatland Planting Co. LLCRolling Fork, MS 39159$64,511
20John M LewisHollandale, MS 38748$59,788

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag