Market Loss Assistance Program in Issaquena County, Mississippi, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 219
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Issaquena County, Mississippi totaled $9,578,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | G M Farms | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $657,904 |
2 | Buckshot Farms | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $598,177 |
3 | Esperanza Planting Co | Glen Allan, MS 38744 | $591,105 |
4 | Valley Park Farms | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $476,208 |
5 | Heigle Farms A Partnership | Mayersville, MS 39113 | $295,526 |
6 | Nipper Farms Partnership | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $258,200 |
7 | Woodruff Farms | Grace, MS 38745 | $256,808 |
8 | Hamlin And Hamlin N P | Grace, MS 38745 | $248,234 |
9 | Johnson Farms | Valley Park, MS 39177 | $225,816 |
10 | B & R Farms | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $207,830 |
11 | Magnolia Plantation | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $200,595 |
12 | Japataha | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $194,668 |
13 | O J Sharpe Farms | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $176,584 |
14 | Jr Heigle Farms | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $173,880 |
15 | Alps Plantation | Glen Allan, MS 38744 | $167,437 |
16 | Lynndale Partners | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $160,022 |
17 | Clifton & Hope Porter Farms | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $158,688 |
18 | Catledge Brothers Farm | Moss Point, MS 39563 | $157,470 |
19 | Hunter Farms | Glen Allan, MS 38744 | $135,658 |
20 | Albert Mahalitc | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $133,981 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>