Total Commodity Programs in Issaquena County, Mississippi, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 499
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Issaquena County, Mississippi totaled $122,111,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Clyde & Linda Nichols Farm | Glen Allan, MS 38744 | $1,293,855 |
22 | Woodruff Farms | Grace, MS 38745 | $1,258,951 |
23 | Albert Mahalitc | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $1,250,285 |
24 | Martin Farms | Anguilla, MS 38721 | $1,229,157 |
25 | Moore Company | Cary, MS 39054 | $1,218,796 |
26 | Clifton & Hope Porter Farms | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $1,072,261 |
27 | Johnson Farms | Valley Park, MS 39177 | $1,066,558 |
28 | Forest Glade Plantation | Grace, MS 38745 | $1,025,740 |
29 | Todd Heigle Farms Inc | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $1,009,544 |
30 | Wade Farms | Grace, MS 38745 | $978,906 |
31 | Windham Farms Inc | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $974,193 |
32 | Waye Windham Farms | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $967,544 |
33 | Trey Heigle Farms | Madison, MS 39110 | $948,881 |
34 | G S Partnership | Mayersville, MS 39113 | $929,474 |
35 | Cannonwall Plantation Inc | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $904,188 |
36 | Boll Planting Co Inc | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $896,293 |
37 | Kelso Farms | Valley Park, MS 39177 | $880,672 |
38 | Stan Delaney | Grace, MS 38745 | $850,111 |
39 | Chris Mahalitc | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $812,809 |
40 | Ronnie D Kerr | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $778,674 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”