Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Panola County, Mississippi, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 301
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Panola County, Mississippi totaled $4,449,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | James Russell | Batesville, MS 38606 | $58,520 |
22 | Hill Country Cattle, LLC | Batesville, MS 38606 | $56,419 |
23 | Ashton Mackenzie Alexander | Batesville, MS 38606 | $55,172 |
24 | Rice Planting Company | Batesville, MS 38606 | $53,003 |
25 | Stone Corner Farms | Batesville, MS 38606 | $51,958 |
26 | Ballentine Farms Partnership | Sardis, MS 38666 | $51,191 |
27 | Rusty T Vaughan | Batesville, MS 38606 | $49,291 |
28 | Beard Farms | Sardis, MS 38666 | $41,131 |
29 | Felix T Mills | Oxford, MS 38655 | $38,445 |
30 | Hal Renfro | Crowder, MS 38622 | $37,131 |
31 | Ernest Vaughan | Batesville, MS 38606 | $33,901 |
32 | Presley Farms | Crenshaw, MS 38621 | $29,954 |
33 | Cmb Farm LLC | Sledge, MS 38670 | $29,764 |
34 | Jessica Simmerman | Batesville, MS 38606 | $25,730 |
35 | Robert Ferrell | Batesville, MS 38606 | $23,826 |
36 | George Frank Herring Jr | Batesville, MS 38606 | $21,780 |
37 | L & G Farms Inc | Marks, MS 38646 | $21,684 |
38 | Macedonia Farms LLC | Batesville, MS 38606 | $21,403 |
39 | James Mcbride | Nesbit, MS 38651 | $20,955 |
40 | James Griffin | Batesville, MS 38606 | $19,773 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”