Market Loss Assistance Program in Panola County, Mississippi, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 796
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Panola County, Mississippi totaled $10,643,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Mims Farms | Batesville, MS 38606 | $123,150 |
22 | W & W Planting Co LLC | Senatobia, MS 38668 | $117,559 |
23 | Thomas Farms Partnership | Batesville, MS 38606 | $115,248 |
24 | William C Adair Jr | Como, MS 38619 | $112,137 |
25 | Porter's Ferry Farms | Batesville, MS 38606 | $107,440 |
26 | J & P Farms Inc | Batesville, MS 38606 | $106,151 |
27 | S & L Farms | Courtland, MS 38620 | $105,785 |
28 | A C Atkinson | Batesville, MS 38606 | $104,829 |
29 | Double A Farms Inc | Batesville, MS 38606 | $103,221 |
30 | West Side Farms Inc | Batesville, MS 38606 | $102,237 |
31 | R & K Farms | Batesville, MS 38606 | $99,920 |
32 | Michael Wayne Darby Jr | Pope, MS 38658 | $97,778 |
33 | Danny Magee | Batesville, MS 38606 | $97,244 |
34 | William C Adair Jr Trust | Como, MS 38619 | $96,835 |
35 | Sam Presley III | Crenshaw, MS 38621 | $96,296 |
36 | Kingwood Farms LLC | Pope, MS 38658 | $95,712 |
37 | James Russell | Batesville, MS 38606 | $95,540 |
38 | Thomas G And Miriam B Hamer Living Trust | Dyersburg, TN 38024 | $88,588 |
39 | Bobby Woodruff | Batesville, MS 38606 | $87,571 |
40 | Nickle Farms II | Batesville, MS 38606 | $80,353 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”