Conservation Reserve Program in Pike County, Mississippi, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 26
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Pike County, Mississippi totaled $37,985 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | J H Tucker Family Properties LLC | Mccomb, MS 39648 | $5,650 |
2 | Lawson Timber Co LLC | Gretna, LA 70056 | $3,222 |
3 | David Johnson | Osyka, MS 39657 | $2,631 |
4 | Kim Cutrera | Metairie, LA 70002 | $2,606 |
5 | Richie Q Bullock Jr | Baker, LA 70714 | $2,144 |
6 | Frank Henchy Md | Hammond, LA 70401 | $1,992 |
7 | The G M Varnado Testamentary Trust III | Denham Springs, LA 70726 | $1,898 |
8 | Henchy Mississippi Land Holding L | Baton Rouge, LA 70809 | $1,874 |
9 | Travis And Graham Country Acres L | Magnolia, MS 39652 | $1,800 |
10 | Barc Properties LLC | Clinton, MS 39056 | $1,688 |
11 | Barclay Family Trust | Clinton, MS 39056 | $1,479 |
12 | Otis Lenwood Welsh Jr | Slidell, LA 70458 | $1,296 |
13 | William H Welsh | Lafayette, LA 70508 | $1,296 |
14 | Osyka Farms LLC | Saint Amant, LA 70774 | $1,248 |
15 | Juanita M Seale | Summit, MS 39666 | $1,109 |
16 | Todd Bullock | Mccomb, MS 39648 | $960 |
17 | Sheila C Pitarro | Hammond, LA 70401 | $924 |
18 | Kerry Eugene Shaver | Thibodaux, LA 70301 | $923 |
19 | Glenda N Lord | Summit, MS 39666 | $820 |
20 | James Gary Felder | Summit, MS 39666 | $798 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>