Farm Subsidy information
Sharkey County, Mississippi
Total Subsidies in Sharkey County, Mississippi, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 167
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Sharkey County, Mississippi totaled $8,575,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Moore Company | Cary, MS 39054 | $344,700 |
2 | B & B Farms | Valley Park, MS 39177 | $223,698 |
3 | Cary Associates | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $182,469 |
4 | Lynndale Partners | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $154,220 |
5 | Coghlan & Sons | Holly Bluff, MS 39088 | $138,431 |
6 | Nicholson Farms Partnership | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $110,502 |
7 | P & J Farms Partnership | Anguilla, MS 38721 | $107,940 |
8 | Ewing Planting Company | Anguilla, MS 38721 | $98,575 |
9 | Clark And Clark Partnership | Anguilla, MS 38721 | $94,936 |
10 | Martin Plantation | Anguilla, MS 38721 | $81,202 |
11 | Whitten & Whitten Inc | Valley Park, MS 39177 | $78,177 |
12 | , | $70,468 | |
13 | Delta City Planting Company | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $69,309 |
14 | , | $69,114 | |
15 | Howle Planting Company | Anguilla, MS 38721 | $66,545 |
16 | Patterson & Sons Partnership | Anguilla, MS 38721 | $63,454 |
17 | C & J Smith Farms Inc | Anguilla, MS 38721 | $62,745 |
18 | C & B Farms | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $61,551 |
19 | J & L Farms | Holly Bluff, MS 39088 | $58,096 |
20 | Carter Plantation Limited | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $56,149 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>