Counter Cyclical Program in Sharkey County, Mississippi, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 240
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Sharkey County, Mississippi totaled $39,198,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Bruton Farms Partnership | Hollandale, MS 38748 | $2,742,927 |
2 | Egremont-baconia Farms | Cary, MS 39054 | $2,010,637 |
3 | Mont Helena Associates | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $2,002,657 |
4 | Martin Farms | Anguilla, MS 38721 | $1,827,297 |
5 | B L Lamensdorf Farms | Cary, MS 39054 | $1,799,876 |
6 | Ewing Planting Company | Anguilla, MS 38721 | $1,554,556 |
7 | Lynndale Partners | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $1,474,425 |
8 | Carter Plantation Limited | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $1,385,343 |
9 | New Panther Farms Partnership | Panther Burn, MS 38765 | $1,102,153 |
10 | Hollis Farms | Anguilla, MS 38721 | $992,499 |
11 | B & C Farms | Anguilla, MS 38721 | $985,979 |
12 | Cary Associates | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $835,368 |
13 | Kin Growers | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $805,858 |
14 | Ewing Farms | Anguilla, MS 38721 | $776,658 |
15 | Hargrave Farms | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $697,706 |
16 | J & B Farms | Vicksburg, MS 39183 | $673,996 |
17 | Hollingsworth & Company | Hollandale, MS 38748 | $651,683 |
18 | L & R Farms | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $641,560 |
19 | Sharkey Planting Company | Holly Bluff, MS 39088 | $640,966 |
20 | Patton Farms Joint Venture | Nitta Yuma, MS 38721 | $637,174 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>