Farm Subsidy information
Tunica County, Mississippi
Total Subsidies in Tunica County, Mississippi, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 173
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Tunica County, Mississippi totaled $16,419,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Cow Oak Farms | Tunica, MS 38676 | $83,971 |
42 | Whitten Farms | Tunica, MS 38676 | $80,620 |
43 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $79,279 |
44 | Workman Farm | Sledge, MS 38670 | $78,159 |
45 | Mclean Grain | Tunica, MS 38676 | $71,442 |
46 | Black Sheep Farms, Inc. | Tunica, MS 38676 | $69,588 |
47 | Big 6 Farms II | Robinsonville, MS 38664 | $65,735 |
48 | James A Pegram III | Tunica, MS 38676 | $64,648 |
49 | Horseshoe Bottom Farms LLC | Tunica, MS 38676 | $59,169 |
50 | Little Thailand Farms II | Nesbit, MS 38651 | $58,879 |
51 | Berry Farm Enterprises | Robinsonville, MS 38664 | $58,154 |
52 | 247 Farms Inc. | Tunica, MS 38676 | $52,881 |
53 | Jim Pegram Farms | Tunica, MS 38676 | $52,831 |
54 | James E Daniel Jr | Tunica, MS 38676 | $47,558 |
55 | Jackie Davis | Dundee, MS 38626 | $44,759 |
56 | Oneida Farms | Nesbit, MS 38651 | $41,733 |
57 | Mcclintock Companies | Tunica, MS 38676 | $36,659 |
58 | Southpaw Farms | Tunica, MS 38676 | $35,840 |
59 | Whiteoak Farms Inc | Tunica, MS 38676 | $35,831 |
60 | Delta Planting Co LLC | Como, MS 38619 | $35,071 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”