Counter Cyclical Program in Tunica County, Mississippi, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 236
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Tunica County, Mississippi totaled $33,344,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Brad Cobb Farms 1993 | Tunica, MS 38676 | $2,487,238 |
2 | Bowdre Place | Robinsonville, MS 38664 | $2,371,145 |
3 | Whitten Farms | Tunica, MS 38676 | $2,023,811 |
4 | Riverfield Farms | Robinsonville, MS 38664 | $1,668,396 |
5 | Battle Associates | Tunica, MS 38676 | $1,433,888 |
6 | Limerick Farms | Tunica, MS 38676 | $1,395,512 |
7 | Maud Farms | Dundee, MS 38626 | $1,348,549 |
8 | M P Farms | Tunica, MS 38676 | $1,337,355 |
9 | Michael E Johnson & Son | Tunica, MS 38676 | $1,163,793 |
10 | Hastings Farms | Tunica, MS 38676 | $1,094,037 |
11 | Walls Farming Company | Tunica, MS 38676 | $1,006,656 |
12 | Perry Farms | Tunica, MS 38676 | $938,260 |
13 | J & B Farms | Tunica, MS 38676 | $824,786 |
14 | Delta Hills Farms A Partnership | Tunica, MS 38676 | $799,013 |
15 | Dundee Farms | Dundee, MS 38626 | $609,279 |
16 | Canon Farms | Tunica, MS 38676 | $549,186 |
17 | The Bibb Company | Tunica, MS 38676 | $522,727 |
18 | Berry Farm Enterprises | Robinsonville, MS 38664 | $479,507 |
19 | Woolfolk Farm & Land Company | Tunica, MS 38676 | $396,197 |
20 | J D Boyd Farms Inc | Dundee, MS 38626 | $380,729 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>