Total Commodity Programs in Union County, Mississippi, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,612
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Union County, Mississippi totaled $30,006,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Brewer Bottom Farms Inc | Saltillo, MS 38866 | $165,944 |
42 | Timothy Delane Rowan | New Albany, MS 38652 | $160,643 |
43 | Kerry L Coker | Blue Springs, MS 38828 | $154,576 |
44 | Dave Kitchens | New Albany, MS 38652 | $150,463 |
45 | Pannell & Pannell L P | Blue Springs, MS 38828 | $138,354 |
46 | Anne Wages | Blue Springs, MS 38828 | $135,489 |
47 | Joseph Mcgaha | New Albany, MS 38652 | $134,206 |
48 | Brad Willard | Etta, MS 38627 | $129,537 |
49 | Brett Willard | Etta, MS 38627 | $128,303 |
50 | James Hogue | Blue Springs, MS 38828 | $128,111 |
51 | Michael R Pannell | Blue Springs, MS 38828 | $122,756 |
52 | Wilburn Gregory | New Albany, MS 38652 | $122,688 |
53 | Robert M And Norma J Brownlee Revocable Trust | Myrtle, MS 38650 | $121,807 |
54 | D & B Farms | New Albany, MS 38652 | $119,455 |
55 | Jimmy Kennedy | New Albany, MS 38652 | $116,576 |
56 | Margaret L Morris Dba Morris Feed | Myrtle, MS 38650 | $113,017 |
57 | Jerrell L Pannell | New Albany, MS 38652 | $112,886 |
58 | William E Freeman | New Albany, MS 38652 | $109,328 |
59 | Ellis Properties L P | Tupelo, MS 38804 | $103,515 |
60 | Alford E Pankey | New Albany, MS 38652 | $101,611 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”