Farm Subsidy information
Warren County, Mississippi
Total Subsidies in Warren County, Mississippi, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 166
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Warren County, Mississippi totaled $5,133,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Business First Bank ** | Houma, LA 70360 | $251,212 |
2 | The Jefferson Bank ** | Greenville, MS 38704 | $237,036 |
3 | Floweree Planting Company | Redwood, MS 39156 | $204,318 |
4 | Paradise Farms Partnership | Vicksburg, MS 39180 | $200,819 |
5 | J & J Farms | Vicksburg, MS 39180 | $190,066 |
6 | Bank Of Anguilla ** | Anguilla, MS 38721 | $190,016 |
7 | Riverhills Bank ** | Port Gibson, MS 39150 | $170,504 |
8 | Staple Cotton Discount Corp | Greenwood, MS 38935 | $152,590 |
9 | Circle Z Farms LLC | Redwood, MS 39156 | $123,029 |
10 | Strick's Harvesting LLC | Vicksburg, MS 39180 | $94,593 |
11 | Aro Inc. | Redwood, MS 39156 | $69,783 |
12 | Kelso Farms | Valley Park, MS 39177 | $65,900 |
13 | Mjk Property | Vicksburg, MS 39181 | $62,680 |
14 | Edward R Mcknight Iv | Vicksburg, MS 39180 | $62,448 |
15 | Aden Farms | Valley Park, MS 39177 | $61,768 |
16 | T B Henry & Sons | Vicksburg, MS 39183 | $53,000 |
17 | David S Wansley | Vicksburg, MS 39183 | $51,923 |
18 | E R Mcknight & Sons | Vicksburg, MS 39183 | $50,687 |
19 | Brierfield-hurricane LLC | Natchez, MS 39120 | $50,000 |
20 | Purvis Grange Foundation Inc Dba Tara Wildlife | Vicksburg, MS 39183 | $46,903 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>