Market Gains in Washington County, Mississippi, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 216
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Washington County, Mississippi totaled $25,283,000 in from 1995-2023.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fontenot And Fontenot | Hollandale, MS 38748 | $1,454,520 |
| 2 | Mccaskill Farms | Leland, MS 38756 | $1,352,812 |
| 3 | Murrell Farms | Avon, MS 38723 | $1,104,657 |
| 4 | Theunissen Farms Partnership | Hollandale, MS 38748 | $926,823 |
| 5 | Gypsy Farms | Greenville, MS 38703 | $612,174 |
| 6 | Myers Farms | Eudora, AR 71640 | $610,774 |
| 7 | Coco Planting Co | Avon, MS 38723 | $516,956 |
| 8 | Frey Frey & Frey | Hollandale, MS 38748 | $476,213 |
| 9 | Vanlandingham Farms | Leland, MS 38756 | $455,279 |
| 10 | Z M & J M Looney | Leland, MS 38756 | $454,524 |
| 11 | Greer Greer & Son Partnership | Hollandale, MS 38748 | $436,289 |
| 12 | Hollywood Farms | Glen Allan, MS 38744 | $425,445 |
| 13 | G T & T Farms | Greenville, MS 38701 | $396,584 |
| 14 | Forrest City Farms | Hollandale, MS 38748 | $384,071 |
| 15 | Opossum Ridge Planting Co | Hollandale, MS 38748 | $370,636 |
| 16 | Middleton Planting Company | Glen Allan, MS 38744 | $369,319 |
| 17 | Helm Plantation Partnership | Leland, MS 38756 | $367,621 |
| 18 | G M Farms | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $364,202 |
| 19 | Baggett Farms | Greenville, MS 38704 | $335,529 |
| 20 | P & W Etienne Farms | Hollandale, MS 38748 | $325,784 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Increasing crop reference prices would hurt young farmers
Do billionaires get farm subsidies?
Crop insurance pays billions in weather-related losses linked to the climate crisis
Crop insurance costs soar over time, reaching a record high in 2022
As the climate emergency heats up the Southwest, crop insurance payouts for heat surge
In the intensifying climate crisis, a hotter Southwest spurs rising heat-related crop insurance costs
