Farm Subsidy information
Yalobusha County, Mississippi
Total Subsidies in Yalobusha County, Mississippi, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 324
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Yalobusha County, Mississippi totaled $2,763,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Cypress Creek Farming Company, Inc | Coffeeville, MS 38922 | $254,420 |
2 | Williamson Family Farms | Water Valley, MS 38965 | $186,446 |
3 | Bailey & Sons | Grenada, MS 38901 | $157,420 |
4 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $121,688 |
5 | First South Farm Credit Aca ** | Winnsboro, LA 71295 | $119,017 |
6 | John R Ingram Farms | Water Valley, MS 38965 | $109,958 |
7 | Justin A Brooks | Water Valley, MS 38965 | $103,989 |
8 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $102,800 |
9 | Brooks Farms | Water Valley, MS 38965 | $75,522 |
10 | Diana B Lishman | Vardaman, MS 38878 | $65,224 |
11 | Candice P Mcgreger | Calhoun City, MS 38916 | $58,710 |
12 | Justin Brooks Farms | Water Valley, MS 38965 | $50,034 |
13 | Regions Bank ** | Grenada, MS 38901 | $33,511 |
14 | Robert Lishman | Vardaman, MS 38878 | $32,900 |
15 | William C Pullen | Water Valley, MS 38965 | $24,969 |
16 | Bowen Farm | Randolph, MS 38864 | $23,411 |
17 | Kenneth Harmon | Water Valley, MS 38965 | $21,131 |
18 | Mike Coleman | Coffeeville, MS 38922 | $21,040 |
19 | Hillcrest Farms | Memphis, TN 38111 | $20,818 |
20 | John R Wood Sr | Water Valley, MS 38965 | $19,837 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>