Direct Payment Program in Missouri, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 95,890
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Missouri totaled $1,967,000,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | R J S Burke Partnership | Charleston, MO 63834 | $861,050 |
62 | Terry Scott Farms Partnership | Gobler, MO 63849 | $855,317 |
63 | John R & Janet Davis Joint Venture | Dudley, MO 63936 | $852,270 |
64 | Hrb Farming Partnership | Mooresville, MO 64664 | $847,426 |
65 | Larry Bradfield Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $838,979 |
66 | Brian Shramek Farms | Kingdom City, MO 65262 | $831,002 |
67 | Elvin Kingree Farms | Dudley, MO 63936 | $823,757 |
68 | Fch Guethle Farms | Dexter, MO 63841 | $823,634 |
69 | Thomas Farms | Neelyville, MO 63954 | $820,007 |
70 | Michael & Cynthia Bell Farms | Bloomfield, MO 63825 | $819,265 |
71 | Curry Farm Partnership | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $818,289 |
72 | Garry Brown Farms | Dexter, MO 63841 | $816,591 |
73 | Moreton Partnership | Charleston, MO 63834 | $808,758 |
74 | Barry L Richardson Jr Farms | Marston, MO 63866 | $804,555 |
75 | C And A Farms | Blytheville, AR 72316 | $792,523 |
76 | Triple D Farms | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $790,533 |
77 | Cdls Farming Partnership | Dexter, MO 63841 | $774,497 |
78 | Bob Lowrey Farms - Old | Dexter, MO 63841 | $769,772 |
79 | Tanner Seed Farms | Bernie, MO 63822 | $763,312 |
80 | Bell Planting Company | Bell City, MO 63735 | $761,337 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”