SURE - 2010 Recovery Act Program in Missouri, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 8,158
Recipients of SURE - 2010 Recovery Act Program from farms in Missouri totaled $167,564,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | SURE - 2010 Recovery Act Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Wayne Johnson Farms | Spickard, MO 64679 | $514,765 |
2 | B Dawson Planting Company | Cape Girardeau, MO 63701 | $500,000 |
3 | Dale Farming Company | Ridgeway, MO 64481 | $489,065 |
4 | Level Land Farms | Bernie, MO 63822 | $455,264 |
5 | Hrb Farming Partnership | Mooresville, MO 64664 | $438,788 |
6 | Meinke Farms | Princeton, MO 64673 | $409,612 |
7 | Brian Shramek Farms | Kingdom City, MO 65262 | $400,000 |
8 | Star Farms | Mexico, MO 65265 | $386,058 |
9 | Lambert Joseph Hagan Jr | Monroe City, MO 63456 | $377,408 |
10 | David Palmer Farms Inc | Bolckow, MO 64427 | $330,000 |
11 | Niemeyer Family Farms | Bowling Green, MO 63334 | $318,040 |
12 | John Steven Heinecke | Stoutsville, MO 65283 | $300,000 |
13 | Charles Lynn Horter | Kahoka, MO 63445 | $300,000 |
14 | Bleigh Farms Inc | Hannibal, MO 63401 | $277,928 |
15 | Harold Edward Klocke | Maywood, MO 63454 | $274,640 |
16 | Randy Klocke | Ewing, MO 63440 | $272,643 |
17 | Janet M Klocke | Ewing, MO 63440 | $272,616 |
18 | Steven K Cunningham Revocable Trust | Mound City, MO 64470 | $269,146 |
19 | Doris I Cunningham Revocable Trus | Craig, MO 64437 | $269,122 |
20 | Jerry F Shultz | Rutledge, MO 63563 | $269,081 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>