Farm Subsidy information
Bates County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in Bates County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 3,625
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Bates County, Missouri totaled $345,366,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Leslie Dell Nation | Butler, MO 64730 | $784,407 |
42 | Brown Farms Eddie Inc | Appleton City, MO 64724 | $760,631 |
43 | Kenneth E Gregory | Urich, MO 64788 | $753,113 |
44 | Craig Michael Nation | Rich Hill, MO 64779 | $752,903 |
45 | Mark Edwin Nelson | Amoret, MO 64722 | $748,792 |
46 | Floyd C Rapp | Rockville, MO 64780 | $744,483 |
47 | Thomas Edwin Ferguson | Adrian, MO 64720 | $741,280 |
48 | Brett Allan Harkrader | Appleton City, MO 64724 | $738,839 |
49 | Daniel Martin Wainscott | Butler, MO 64730 | $738,264 |
50 | Francis Phillip Lesmeister | Butler, MO 64730 | $731,881 |
51 | Brian O Seider | Butler, MO 64730 | $724,917 |
52 | Mark Cox Farms LLC | Butler, MO 64730 | $724,137 |
53 | Carl Lee Ferguson | Adrian, MO 64720 | $714,969 |
54 | Devern Ray Koehn | Rich Hill, MO 64779 | $711,424 |
55 | Clifford G Rapp | Rockville, MO 64780 | $706,415 |
56 | Larry W Cook | Butler, MO 64730 | $696,805 |
57 | Michelle Lynn Brownsberger | Butler, MO 64730 | $687,988 |
58 | Cheryl Jane Cook | Butler, MO 64730 | $684,133 |
59 | Yarick Farms Inc | Rich Hill, MO 64779 | $677,519 |
60 | Clayton William Mcelwain | Butler, MO 64730 | $672,000 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”