Market Gains in Benton County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 45
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Benton County, Missouri totaled $437,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Jenna Lee Ficken | Ionia, MO 65335 | $3,356 |
22 | John R Hunt | Columbia, MO 65203 | $2,986 |
23 | James Arno Mehrens | Lincoln, MO 65338 | $2,405 |
24 | Larry Dale Harms | Mora, MO 65345 | $2,236 |
25 | Willard Lee Gerken | Lincoln, MO 65338 | $2,124 |
26 | John Mcmillin | Warsaw, MO 65355 | $2,082 |
27 | Wayne Schumacher | Cole Camp, MO 65325 | $1,852 |
28 | Mark Edward Harms | Windsor, MO 65360 | $1,641 |
29 | Frederick Clarence Hesse | Lincoln, MO 65338 | $1,551 |
30 | Matthew Kirk Hesse | Cole Camp, MO 65325 | $1,551 |
31 | Bernard W Rekus | Orland Park, IL 60467 | $1,503 |
32 | Kenneth Eckhoff | Cole Camp, MO 65325 | $1,503 |
33 | Charles Cordes | Mora, MO 65345 | $1,356 |
34 | Darryl Mac Harms | Cole Camp, MO 65325 | $1,231 |
35 | Arthur Harold Hagen | Cole Camp, MO 65325 | $525 |
36 | Brent A Harms | Ionia, MO 65335 | $431 |
37 | Mark Alan Eifert | Lincoln, MO 65338 | $430 |
38 | Ronald L Eickhoff | Ionia, MO 65335 | $270 |
39 | Randal Dean Meyer | Cole Camp, MO 65325 | $222 |
40 | Milburn Marcus Harms | Cole Camp, MO 65325 | $217 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”