Total Conservation Programs in Buchanan County, Missouri, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 165
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Buchanan County, Missouri totaled $528,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | J.w. Gilges III Trust Dtd June 6, 1985 | Kansas City, MO 64152 | $3,972 |
42 | Leroy Clark | Easton, MO 64443 | $3,858 |
43 | Ryan J Atha | Agency, MO 64401 | $3,654 |
44 | James R Wright | Saint Joseph, MO 64503 | $3,553 |
45 | Francis L Peniston Tr Dated January 7 1991 | Easton, MO 64443 | $3,522 |
46 | Roman Janorschke | Saint Joseph, MO 64504 | $3,409 |
47 | Gromer Hines Farms Inc | Saint Joseph, MO 64507 | $3,319 |
48 | Shawn L Budine | Faucett, MO 64448 | $3,294 |
49 | Bob L Horn | Kansas City, MO 64155 | $3,251 |
50 | Roland C Peterson Revocable Trust | Easton, MO 64443 | $3,249 |
51 | Jerry Davison | Rushville, MO 64484 | $3,204 |
52 | Nelson-pettis Farms LLC | Flower Mound, TX 75028 | $3,130 |
53 | Edward F Fedrizzi | Dearborn, MO 64439 | $3,014 |
54 | Chad W Meers | Easton, MO 64443 | $2,882 |
55 | Ron M Cilke | Easton, MO 64443 | $2,774 |
56 | Scott Michael Crockett | Rushville, MO 64484 | $2,645 |
57 | F & L Holdings, LLC | Saint Joseph, MO 64507 | $2,506 |
58 | David L Reddick | De Kalb, MO 64440 | $2,452 |
59 | Stephen W Blazer | Easton, MO 64443 | $2,421 |
60 | Jack Bridges | Saint Joseph, MO 64506 | $2,405 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”