Total Disaster Programs in Cape Girardeau County, Missouri, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 944
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Cape Girardeau County, Missouri totaled $7,664,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Clyde & Larry Quade Farms | Chaffee, MO 63740 | $247,511 |
2 | Truman Birk Trust | Jackson, MO 63755 | $191,636 |
3 | Quade Farms | Chaffee, MO 63740 | $153,370 |
4 | Joe Kirk Kinder | Oak Ridge, MO 63769 | $142,639 |
5 | Schwartz Brothers Inc | Scott City, MO 63780 | $122,940 |
6 | Stanley Lee Propst | Cape Girardeau, MO 63701 | $110,592 |
7 | Terry N Givens Revocable Trust | Whitewater, MO 63785 | $103,186 |
8 | Shirley Birk Trust | Jackson, MO 63755 | $102,323 |
9 | David C Johnson | Whitewater, MO 63785 | $96,650 |
10 | Darrell Gene Hahs | Friedheim, MO 63747 | $85,476 |
11 | Dewayne M Birk | Burfordville, MO 63739 | $77,408 |
12 | Paul W Suhr | Oak Ridge, MO 63769 | $76,878 |
13 | Robert E Hahs Rev Trust | Friedheim, MO 63747 | $70,258 |
14 | Robert E Sanders | Whitewater, MO 63785 | $66,804 |
15 | Teresa R O'loughlin | Oak Ridge, MO 63769 | $61,727 |
16 | Marvin Aufdenberg Sons LLC | Burfordville, MO 63739 | $59,042 |
17 | J & C Seyer Farms LLC | Oak Ridge, MO 63769 | $54,613 |
18 | Latham Lumber Company, Inc | Jackson, MO 63755 | $52,875 |
19 | Seabaugh Rev Living Trust | Oak Ridge, MO 63769 | $51,888 |
20 | Ksk Farms Inc | Friedheim, MO 63747 | $51,145 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>