Conservation Reserve Program in Cass County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 790
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Cass County, Missouri totaled $21,474,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Brian Bagby | Plano, TX 75024 | $146,053 |
22 | Harris O Stevens | Garden City, MO 64747 | $143,070 |
23 | Charles D Barnes | Harrisonville, MO 64701 | $142,198 |
24 | J Harold Smith | Harrisonville, MO 64701 | $141,191 |
25 | Linda P Nash | Cleveland, MO 64734 | $140,940 |
26 | Charles P Stackhouse | Archie, MO 64725 | $135,536 |
27 | Richard T Hamblin Revocable Trust | Drexel, MO 64742 | $132,979 |
28 | Forrest Ellis Webster | Harrisonville, MO 64701 | $130,509 |
29 | Bryan Edward Winter | Garden City, MO 64747 | $129,439 |
30 | Joseph D Yoder | Garden City, MO 64747 | $124,597 |
31 | Howard W Archer | Raymore, MO 64083 | $124,568 |
32 | Albert D Addleman | Springfield, MO 65804 | $123,351 |
33 | Ronald & Ethel Kirby Revocable Li | Raymore, MO 64083 | $114,075 |
34 | Roger Earl Orr | Garden City, MO 64747 | $113,417 |
35 | Jack Lane | Garden City, MO 64747 | $112,701 |
36 | John Andrew Cole | Garden City, MO 64747 | $112,009 |
37 | Hal Kent Jones | Creighton, MO 64739 | $109,485 |
38 | Lucia Minerva Orr | Garden City, MO 64747 | $108,324 |
39 | John E Grauberger | Louisburg, KS 66053 | $107,528 |
40 | David A Yahnig | Drexel, MO 64742 | $104,337 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”