Farm Subsidy information
Chariton County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in Chariton County, Missouri, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 3,620
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Chariton County, Missouri totaled $325,414,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Fuemmeler Farms Inc | Salisbury, MO 65281 | $2,507,462 |
2 | Howard S Ratliff Trust | Salisbury, MO 65281 | $2,323,014 |
3 | Richard W Mauzey And Deborah L Mauzey Family Trust | Mendon, MO 64660 | $2,043,967 |
4 | Guilford Farms Inc | Sumner, MO 64681 | $1,896,079 |
5 | Bixenman Farms Inc | Salisbury, MO 65281 | $1,803,832 |
6 | Brenda Jones | Mendon, MO 64660 | $1,762,935 |
7 | Walnut Creek Farms Inc | Keytesville, MO 65261 | $1,662,170 |
8 | Moseley Family Trust | Rothville, MO 64676 | $1,558,745 |
9 | Ricky Alan Manson | Brunswick, MO 65236 | $1,441,213 |
10 | Joe E Jones Farms Inc | Keytesville, MO 65261 | $1,393,370 |
11 | Robert J Cooper And Carla A Cooper Family Trust | Salisbury, MO 65281 | $1,361,074 |
12 | Larry Quinn | Keytesville, MO 65261 | $1,353,100 |
13 | Mcneall Farms Inc | Keytesville, MO 65261 | $1,267,869 |
14 | Mauzey Soil Inc | Mendon, MO 64660 | $1,245,846 |
15 | Virgil B Nanneman Inc | Salisbury, MO 65281 | $1,080,773 |
16 | Rick Hayes Farms Inc | Brunswick, MO 65236 | $1,070,017 |
17 | James Edward Fitzgerald Jr | Salisbury, MO 65281 | $1,061,250 |
18 | Daugherity Farms Inc | Sumner, MO 64681 | $1,047,930 |
19 | Jackie L Stark And Martha E Stark Family Trust Dat | Mendon, MO 64660 | $1,009,504 |
20 | Wayne Foster Farms Inc | Sumner, MO 64681 | $1,008,528 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>