Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs in Cole County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 668
Recipients of Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs from farms in Cole County, Missouri totaled $914,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Kenneth Oliver Propst | Jefferson City, MO 65101 | $19,124 |
2 | Charles A Steck | Jefferson City, MO 65109 | $18,931 |
3 | Edna Goldammer | Lohman, MO 65053 | $17,076 |
4 | Ruby Kautsch | Russellville, MO 65074 | $15,268 |
5 | Moreau Valley Farms Inc | Jefferson City, MO 65109 | $13,695 |
6 | Duane Buschjost | Jefferson City, MO 65101 | $9,864 |
7 | David O Braun | Jefferson City, MO 65101 | $9,677 |
8 | Roger Lee Bruemmer | Jefferson City, MO 65101 | $6,826 |
9 | Kbc Prairies Inc | Eugene, MO 65032 | $6,338 |
10 | Lloyd Belt Farms LLC | Henley, MO 65040 | $6,237 |
11 | Donald L Loethen | Lohman, MO 65053 | $6,069 |
12 | George Rehagen | Jefferson City, MO 65101 | $6,053 |
13 | Randy Hunziker | Centertown, MO 65023 | $5,928 |
14 | Arthur F Wankum | Centertown, MO 65023 | $5,890 |
15 | H & A Luebbering | Saint Thomas, MO 65076 | $5,862 |
16 | Popp Brothers' Farms | Jefferson City, MO 65101 | $5,765 |
17 | Marvin D Proctor | Russellville, MO 65074 | $5,576 |
18 | Dorsey Robertson | Russellville, MO 65074 | $5,476 |
19 | Randolph H Buschjost | Saint Thomas, MO 65076 | $5,460 |
20 | Walter Kiesling | Russellville, MO 65074 | $5,338 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>