Farm Subsidy information
Dallas County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in Dallas County, Missouri, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 402
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Dallas County, Missouri totaled $1,291,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Daniel Bower | Phillipsburg, MO 65722 | $89,529 |
| 2 | Kelb Farms LLC | Buffalo, MO 65622 | $66,673 |
| 3 | Bill Cahow | Elkland, MO 65644 | $57,756 |
| 4 | Charles O Dill | Elkland, MO 65644 | $55,787 |
| 5 | Jerald D Mabary | Urbana, MO 65767 | $44,715 |
| 6 | Michael E Brown | Long Lane, MO 65590 | $43,826 |
| 7 | Alva Dill And Sons | Conway, MO 65632 | $40,584 |
| 8 | Harold & Brian Gann Partnership | Long Lane, MO 65590 | $24,588 |
| 9 | Brent Hamlet | Louisburg, MO 65685 | $21,577 |
| 10 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $21,449 |
| 11 | Frank C Jones | Half Way, MO 65663 | $20,855 |
| 12 | Matthew John Wilson | Urbana, MO 65767 | $20,777 |
| 13 | Matthew Brown | Long Lane, MO 65590 | $15,405 |
| 14 | Nathan Michael Brown | Long Lane, MO 65590 | $14,912 |
| 15 | Hollis Henderson | Buffalo, MO 65622 | $14,411 |
| 16 | Robert Poole | Windyville, MO 65783 | $12,321 |
| 17 | Dennie Bramwell | Windyville, MO 65783 | $10,901 |
| 18 | Todd Allan Leer | Long Lane, MO 65590 | $9,866 |
| 19 | Billie Turner Trust | Fair Grove, MO 65648 | $9,258 |
| 20 | Lucas Hale Trust | Buffalo, MO 65622 | $8,932 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf