Farm Subsidy information
Daviess County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in Daviess County, Missouri, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 629
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Daviess County, Missouri totaled $14,347,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Mcbee Family Farms | Gallatin, MO 64640 | $601,819 |
2 | Douglas J Nalle | Pattonsburg, MO 64670 | $345,687 |
3 | Matt Nalle Farms Inc | Pattonsburg, MO 64670 | $318,367 |
4 | Camden Nalle | Pattonsburg, MO 64670 | $238,469 |
5 | Matthew J Nalle | Pattonsburg, MO 64670 | $217,716 |
6 | Landes Ag LLC | Jamesport, MO 64648 | $208,185 |
7 | Jim Nalle Farms Inc | Pattonsburg, MO 64670 | $150,601 |
8 | Timber Creek Farm Lc | Gallatin, MO 64640 | $148,119 |
9 | Mcbee Farms Lc | Gallatin, MO 64640 | $131,085 |
10 | Brandon Wayne Eads | Trenton, MO 64683 | $128,997 |
11 | Aaron Landes | Jamesport, MO 64648 | $116,556 |
12 | Michael Robert Cottrell | Gilman City, MO 64642 | $104,583 |
13 | Norman Keith Sutton | Jamesport, MO 64648 | $61,184 |
14 | Steve Eugene Heldenbrand | Kidder, MO 64649 | $59,264 |
15 | Danan Knott | Coffey, MO 64636 | $57,185 |
16 | Randy Wayne Eads | Coffey, MO 64636 | $53,811 |
17 | Jason Hoover | Pattonsburg, MO 64670 | $47,851 |
18 | Vrc Farmland LLC | Oak Grove, MO 64075 | $46,311 |
19 | Margaret J Fischer | Norwalk, IA 50211 | $43,542 |
20 | Keith Harpster | Kidder, MO 64649 | $43,055 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>