Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in DeKalb County, Missouri, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 236
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in DeKalb County, Missouri totaled $2,130,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Curtis Family Farms LLC | Osborn, MO 64474 | $102,234 |
2 | Stuart Maize | Amity, MO 64422 | $84,003 |
3 | Michael Lewis Deshon | Stewartsville, MO 64490 | $72,136 |
4 | Deshon Brothers | Clarksdale, MO 64430 | $67,834 |
5 | Huffaker Farms LLC | Maysville, MO 64469 | $55,531 |
6 | Deshon Farms LLC | Clarksdale, MO 64430 | $55,269 |
7 | Tom Heath Farms LLC | Helena, MO 64459 | $50,526 |
8 | Dustin Lee Deatherage | King City, MO 64463 | $50,289 |
9 | Kenneth Gene Wells | Union Star, MO 64494 | $48,132 |
10 | Donald Lee Thompson | Osborn, MO 64474 | $47,125 |
11 | Stephani Alise Thompson | Osborn, MO 64474 | $47,125 |
12 | Double S Farms LLC | Stewartsville, MO 64490 | $47,100 |
13 | Mccrea Farms Inc | Maysville, MO 64469 | $41,508 |
14 | Dennis E Marshall | Cameron, MO 64429 | $40,314 |
15 | Peter A Medsker | King City, MO 64463 | $39,507 |
16 | Jah Farms, LLC | Maysville, MO 64469 | $38,229 |
17 | Alex Berry | Pattonsburg, MO 64670 | $38,040 |
18 | Gregory E Berry Trust | Pattonsburg, MO 64670 | $33,589 |
19 | Steven Stagner | Clarksdale, MO 64430 | $32,147 |
20 | P-t Thompson Inc D/b/a T-bar Farm | Cameron, MO 64429 | $30,535 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>