Total Conservation Programs in Linn County, Missouri, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 502
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Linn County, Missouri totaled $4,092,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | , | $50,000 | |
2 | Triplett Farms Inc | Chillicothe, MO 64601 | $49,947 |
3 | John R Miller II | Defiance, MO 63341 | $49,845 |
4 | Chris J Butterfield | Linneus, MO 64653 | $49,210 |
5 | P Thomas Mason | Chestertown, MD 21620 | $46,731 |
6 | Rudy A Head And Jeannine A Head Rvoc Tr Agreement | Overland Park, KS 66221 | $42,872 |
7 | Cheryl Jean Butterfield | Linneus, MO 64653 | $42,458 |
8 | Ellis Burns Irrevocable Trust | Linneus, MO 64653 | $42,228 |
9 | Richard Maxwell Butterfield Jr | Linneus, MO 64653 | $40,417 |
10 | Carol Sayre | Purdin, MO 64674 | $37,147 |
11 | The Lana Buswell Revocable Trust | Carrollton, MO 64633 | $33,548 |
12 | Donald Robert Hoover | Saint Catharine, MO 64628 | $33,418 |
13 | Robert Rulon Rev Trust | Brookfield, MO 64628 | $33,110 |
14 | Douglas Stuver Black | Saint Catharine, MO 64628 | $30,445 |
15 | Laakers Acres North Missouri Properties LLC | Saint Louis, MO 63129 | $30,414 |
16 | Burtch Farms Inc | Chula, MO 64635 | $29,349 |
17 | Michael J Hepler | Browning, MO 64630 | $29,216 |
18 | Murrell Enterprises LLC | Linneus, MO 64653 | $28,237 |
19 | Ott J Coulson | Saint Catharine, MO 64628 | $28,034 |
20 | Phyllis Kay Young | Humphreys, MO 64646 | $27,982 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>