Farm Subsidy information
Macon County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in Macon County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 3,879
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Macon County, Missouri totaled $270,417,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Lee Bixenman Farms Inc | Callao, MO 63534 | $924,913 |
22 | Samuel Clint Jones | Ethel, MO 63539 | $922,337 |
23 | Hartung Bros Inc | Macon, MO 63552 | $913,828 |
24 | Ricky Lynn Mcvicker | Bevier, MO 63532 | $903,388 |
25 | Greg Gunnels | Elmer, MO 63538 | $878,315 |
26 | David Scott Lene | Atlanta, MO 63530 | $850,970 |
27 | Jason C Brand | Excello, MO 65247 | $821,543 |
28 | Larry Lavelle Britt | Callao, MO 63534 | $814,184 |
29 | Larry Britt | Callao, MO 63534 | $804,618 |
30 | Gary Clarkson | La Plata, MO 63549 | $784,207 |
31 | William Douglas Kirkpatrick Living Trust | La Plata, MO 63549 | $766,114 |
32 | Hunters Ridge LLC | Perry, MO 63462 | $765,319 |
33 | Richard Lee Kemp | Clarence, MO 63437 | $746,761 |
34 | Robert W Baker | Atlanta, MO 63530 | $736,255 |
35 | Richard N Gunnels | Elmer, MO 63538 | $732,467 |
36 | Laverne J Stull | Atlanta, MO 63530 | $717,061 |
37 | James A Replogle | Atlanta, MO 63530 | $713,431 |
38 | James Ray Nelson | Atlanta, MO 63530 | $705,060 |
39 | John Charles Hall | Callao, MO 63534 | $698,037 |
40 | Stephen Gunnels | Elmer, MO 63538 | $672,214 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”