Total Conservation Programs in Marion County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 899
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Marion County, Missouri totaled $31,619,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | J A S Properties LLC | Saint Paul, MO 63366 | $145,592 |
42 | Erma Pflantz | Auxvasse, MO 65231 | $145,227 |
43 | Gale M Behring | Hunnewell, MO 63443 | $145,188 |
44 | Norma J Hagerty | Ewing, MO 63440 | $143,754 |
45 | Jl Steffenville Farms LLC | Lewistown, MO 63452 | $142,535 |
46 | Curt Ahring | Monroe City, MO 63456 | $138,289 |
47 | Donald E Redd Trust | Maywood, MO 63454 | $135,707 |
48 | Gerald W Burditt | Monroe City, MO 63456 | $132,401 |
49 | Randall W Highfill | Hannibal, MO 63401 | $131,993 |
50 | James Lloyd White | Monroe City, MO 63456 | $130,522 |
51 | Kevin C Meany Sr | Maywood, MO 63454 | $129,638 |
52 | Sportsmans Farm | Saint Louis, MO 63129 | $129,099 |
53 | Thomas Crane | Hannibal, MO 63401 | $128,908 |
54 | Elsie Hallgren Happel | Palmyra, MO 63461 | $128,446 |
55 | Gordon Smyser | Maywood, MO 63454 | $125,743 |
56 | Glenn W Schulz | Foristell, MO 63348 | $125,130 |
57 | Evelyn B Ellis | New London, MO 63459 | $123,357 |
58 | Konnor Malcom Bridgman | Ewing, MO 63440 | $123,348 |
59 | Vincent Schleiermacher | Ewing, MO 63440 | $122,285 |
60 | Paul Raithel | Hannibal, MO 63401 | $117,243 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”