Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Mercer County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 298
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Mercer County, Missouri totaled $3,333,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Michael H Covey | Princeton, MO 64673 | $36,519 |
22 | Richard Moore | Princeton, MO 64673 | $36,379 |
23 | Prairie Gem Ranch Incorporated | Mercer, MO 64661 | $33,431 |
24 | Greg Reger | Princeton, MO 64673 | $33,415 |
25 | Gregg William Widner | Mercer, MO 64661 | $32,523 |
26 | James E Johnston | Mercer, MO 64661 | $31,856 |
27 | Max Eugene Coon | Mercer, MO 64661 | $31,208 |
28 | Mitchell Gregory Reger | Princeton, MO 64673 | $29,837 |
29 | Dale Beavers | Mercer, MO 64661 | $27,747 |
30 | Derlin Lee Johnson | Trenton, MO 64683 | $27,640 |
31 | David Prichard | Princeton, MO 64673 | $27,053 |
32 | Joe Dale Hartley | Mercer, MO 64661 | $26,124 |
33 | Mike Moore | Princeton, MO 64673 | $25,480 |
34 | Tracy Don Kisky | Leon, IA 50144 | $24,025 |
35 | Chris Lutzen | Mercer, MO 64661 | $23,967 |
36 | Michael D Flowers | Princeton, MO 64673 | $23,658 |
37 | Wood Holt | Princeton, MO 64673 | $23,228 |
38 | Jonathan Adam Price | Princeton, MO 64673 | $20,485 |
39 | Terry Shaffer | Princeton, MO 64673 | $19,790 |
40 | Randal Leonard Illg | Cainsville, MO 64632 | $19,690 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”