Total Commodity Programs in Mercer County, Missouri, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 373
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Mercer County, Missouri totaled $1,738,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Ronald E Stark | Princeton, MO 64673 | $10,282 |
42 | Peter A Malovrh | Princeton, MO 64673 | $10,206 |
43 | Kenneth Eugene Martin | Mercer, MO 64661 | $10,097 |
44 | Clint A Moore | Princeton, MO 64673 | $9,603 |
45 | Jon P Webster | Allerton, IA 50008 | $9,068 |
46 | Jonathan Adam Price | Princeton, MO 64673 | $9,062 |
47 | James Fisher | Waukee, IA 50263 | $8,995 |
48 | Jason Eakes | Cainsville, MO 64632 | $8,791 |
49 | Daniel Joseph Martin | Mercer, MO 64661 | $8,755 |
50 | Garry N Moore | Princeton, MO 64673 | $8,708 |
51 | Randal Leonard Illg | Cainsville, MO 64632 | $8,695 |
52 | Justin Patrick Hill | Mercer, MO 64661 | $8,234 |
53 | Steve Berger | Princeton, MO 64673 | $8,158 |
54 | David Prichard | Princeton, MO 64673 | $7,551 |
55 | Tyler J Hartley | Mercer, MO 64661 | $7,517 |
56 | Marcus Edward Illg | Cainsville, MO 64632 | $7,395 |
57 | Louise Johnson | Trenton, MO 64683 | $7,358 |
58 | Martin Henke | Princeton, MO 64673 | $7,083 |
59 | Tim Tucker | Harris, MO 64645 | $7,075 |
60 | Jerry Hamilton | Princeton, MO 64673 | $6,947 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”