Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Mississippi County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 150
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Mississippi County, Missouri totaled $1,013,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Elnora Loretta Peters Revocable Trust | Bertrand, MO 63823 | $14,667 |
22 | Helen Swayne Farms LLC | Charleston, MO 63834 | $14,470 |
23 | Sam E Story Inc | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $14,444 |
24 | Black Bayou Properties LLC | Charleston, MO 63834 | $14,151 |
25 | Leslie O Collier | Charleston, MO 63834 | $11,269 |
26 | Moxley Farms Inc | Wyatt, MO 63882 | $11,247 |
27 | Wayne A Corse Revocable Living Trust | Charleston, MO 63834 | $10,204 |
28 | Dan Duenne Farms | Charleston, MO 63834 | $10,102 |
29 | French Farms LLC | Bertrand, MO 63823 | $9,937 |
30 | Brian Michael Ray | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $9,889 |
31 | Concord Livestock Company | Charleston, MO 63834 | $9,634 |
32 | Richard Conn | Wyatt, MO 63882 | $9,623 |
33 | Michael G Bollinger | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $9,011 |
34 | Stallings Farms Inc | Charleston, MO 63834 | $8,790 |
35 | Mike Bryant Farms Inc | Charleston, MO 63834 | $8,671 |
36 | Hugh Hunter Farms Inc | Charleston, MO 63834 | $7,914 |
37 | Marshall Affiliates Inc | Charleston, MO 63834 | $7,628 |
38 | Hamil Corse Company LLC | Charleston, MO 63834 | $7,454 |
39 | Mrm Farms Partnership | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $7,386 |
40 | Feezor Farms | Charleston, MO 63834 | $7,046 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”